- SCANNERS
- Film (1980). Filmplan International/Canadian Film Development Corp. Written/dir David CRONENBERG, starring Stephen Lack, Jennifer O'Neal, Patrick McGoohan, Lawrence Dane, Michael Ironside. 103 mins. Colour.This superior PSI-POWERS movie easily outstrips CARRIE (1976) and The FURY (1978). Pregnant women (we learn some way into the film) have been givenan experimental drug, ephemerol, ostensibly a tranquillizer but actually designed to produce paranormal offspring - scanners - who can exercise total control over the brains and nervous systems of others. The two oldest telepaths (brothers, it turns out) are corrupted - in different ways - by their power, though one (Lack) fights for human society, the other (Ironside) for the superhumans. The film is choreographed in the most exemplary manner, from the celebrated exploding-head sequence at the beginning to the final telepathic duel between the brothers and its enigmatic outcome. It is also advanced in sf terms, working sophisticated variations on the MUTANT theme, streets ahead of the usual crudities of psi-power movies. Cronenberg's restless marriage of highbrow metaphor and lowbrow exploitation seldom works better than here, despite sometimes indifferent performances, especially Lack's. The novelization is Scanners * (1981) by Leon Whiteson.Cronenberg had nothing to do with the sequels,also Canadian, of which there have been three with a fourth in production. To date these are Scanners II: The New Order (1990), Scanners III: TheTakeover (1991; vt Scanner Force) and Scanner Cop (1993); the first two were directed by Christian Duguay, the third by Pierre David, and all three were produced by Rene Malo. Probably wisely, none of these even try to duplicate the sophistication and complexity of Cronenberg's vision, but they are slickly made, opting for stylised melodrama and lurid vigour in their accounts of human/scanner and good scanner/bad scanner clashes, and all retain Cronenberg's theme of telepathic powers coming at a painful cost. Scanners III is probably the most compulsive and relentless of the three, but all received more friendly attention from critics than is usual for straight-to-video exploitation film releases.PNSee also: PSEUDO-SCIENCE.
Science Fiction and Fantasy Encyclopedia. Academic. 2011.